Historical overview
Type 10 is the fourth major postwar domestic JGSDF tank line after the Type 61, Type 74, and Type 90. It is a main battle tank, not a light tank, but its design philosophy is unusually weight-conscious for a modern MBT. The official JGSDF equipment page lists a fully equipped weight of about 44 metric tons, crew of three, length of about 9.5 m, width of about 3.2 m, height of about 2.3 m, maximum speed of about 70 km/h, and a 120 mm smoothbore main gun with 12.7 mm and Type 74 7.62 mm machine guns. [JGSDF Equipment] Sources
The vehicle mattered because it answered a specifically Japanese operational problem: how to keep heavy direct-fire armor relevant on a mountainous island nation with bridge and road limits, shrinking tank numbers, aging Type 74s, and a doctrinal shift toward rapid, networked response. The Type 10 was not simply a more powerful Type 90; it was a more deployable, connected, compact MBT designed to share tactical information and operate with infantry and other networked JGSDF units. [JGSDF Equipment; MOD FY2011 Budget; ATLA FY2018 Guide] Sources
It indexes the production tank as V-JP-TYPE10, the TK-X/Type 10 prototype as V-JP-TYPE10-PROTO and P-JP-TKX, and the operator-service record as O-JP-TYPE10. Sources
The most important family members are the TK-X/Type 10 development prototypes, the Type 10 production MBT, and the Type 11 tracked recovery vehicle (11 CVR), which uses the Type 10 hull with the gun and turret removed and recovery equipment installed. No export or licensed-production version is confirmed in the available accounts or official sources in the cited record. [JGSDF Equipment] Sources
Major controversies are mostly source-quality issues rather than disputes over the basic vehicle: public sources disagree or blur the difference between ordered, budgeted, delivered, and fielded quantities; many online accounts repeat unverified armor and ammunition-stowage claims; and the 2026 Hijudai live-fire accident is still under investigation. Type 10 is a highly tailored national MBT optimized for Japanese terrain, infrastructure, and networked defense, but its armor protection, ammunition survivability, and comparative battlefield value remain hard to assess from open sources because it has no combat record and many technical details are classified. [JGSDF Accident 2026-04-21; JGSDF Accident 2026-05-19; Joint Staff Accident Message] Sources
The Type 10 grew out of Japan's postwar domestic tank tradition. The JGSDF fielded the Type 61, Type 74, and Type 90 before the Type 10. Each was a domestic solution to Japan's security policy, industrial base, and geography. By the late Cold War, the Type 90 represented a highly capable third-generation domestic MBT, but its size and cost made it an imperfect all-purpose replacement for the entire older Type 74 fleet. [ATLA FY2018 Guide] Sources
The strategic setting changed after the Cold War. Japan had to maintain credible armored forces while defending dispersed islands, urban infrastructure, and vulnerable approaches. Official budget language from FY2011 described Type 10 procurement in response to the declining power of existing tanks and emphasized a smaller, lighter vehicle with improved mobility and enhanced network-combat capability. This is the core reason the Type 10 cannot be judged only by raw weight, gun caliber, or armor mass. [MOD FY2011 Budget] Sources
The JGSDF official equipment description states that the Type 10 substantially improved anti-armor combat, mobile strike, and response to special-forces attacks. It also states that the vehicle's largest characteristic is its C4I capability, which lets tanks share information with one another and connect with infantry field computer networks for integrated operations. That official framing places the Type 10 inside the JGSDF's network-centric modernization rather than a simple “bigger gun, thicker armor” lineage. [JGSDF Equipment] Sources
Industrially, Japan's tank program preserves domestic design and production capacity. The ATLA equipment guide identifies Mitsubishi Heavy Industries as responsible for the Type 10 body, engine, automatic loader, and transmission, and Japan Steel Works for the cannon assembly. A later ATLA supply-chain explanatory document gives the Type 10 tank as an example of a defense-equipment supply chain involving about 1,300 companies, based on a 2016 ATLA survey. That figure is not a bill of materials, but it illustrates why the tank matters as an industrial ecosystem as well as a combat vehicle. [ATLA FY2018 Guide; ATLA Supply Chain] Sources
Development and variants
Published accounts describe Type 10 Hitomaru as a tank family history rather than as a narrow single-variant entry. The account does not create separate canonical entries for each prototype vehicle because the cited accounts keeps TK-X in prototype/classification records rather than in the main family count. [JGSDF Equipment] Sources
Classification is straightforward at the top level: the Type 10 is a main battle tank. The boundary issue is not whether it is a tank, but whether its lower weight causes it to be described informally as a light or medium tank by outside commentators. Official Japanese and manufacturer sources use tank/MBT language; the chronology and the cited accounts also classify it as a modern main battle tank. Sources
The TK-X designation requires a separate note. Japan used TK-X/MBT-X as a development label; the cited accounts contains both a account and a account for TK-X. Those records are retained here as development lineage records, not as a separate production tank family. That treatment avoids double-counting the same line under both “prototype” and “family” categories. Sources
Related vehicles often confused with Type 10 include the Type 90 MBT, the Type 16 Maneuver Combat Vehicle, and the Type 11 CVR. Type 90 is the older 50-ton class domestic MBT whose service continues alongside Type 10. Type 16 is a wheeled direct-fire vehicle and does not represent a tank family. Type 11 CVR is a recovery/support vehicle using the Type 10 hull and therefore belongs in the family tree as a derivative, not as a gun tank. [JGSDF Equipment] Sources
Published accounts describe the TK-X/Type 10 prototype as a 2000s project that evolved into the Type 10 production tank. Official open sources reviewed here confirm the responsible organizations and production-era configuration more clearly than they confirm every intermediate prototype date. The JGSDF equipment page credits development to the Ministry of Defense Technical Research Headquarters and manufacture to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Japan Steel Works. [JGSDF Equipment] Sources
Secondary and discoverable Japanese-language sources commonly describe development as beginning in the early 2000s, with prototype testing through the mid-to-late 2000s and formal Type 10 adoption/production around 2010. Sources
The prototype program focused on a compact, highly mobile, networked MBT architecture. The JGSDF and MHI public pages both foreground the same themes: real-time data sharing, high-speed mobility, and accurate firing at speed. Those claims are marketing-level summaries, not full test reports, but they are consistent with the official specifications for a 44-ton class tank using a 1,200 hp engine and continuously variable transmission. [MHI Type 10; JGSDF Equipment; ATLA FY2018 Guide] Sources
Procurement has remained low-rate rather than mass-production in the Cold War sense. Published accounts describe “ongoing annual procurement,” and recent official budget documents confirm continuing acquisition: 12 Type 10 tanks in the FY2025 overview and 8 Type 10 MBTs in the FY2026 overview. Because annual budget lines are not the same as actual delivery dates, Published accounts describe “budgeted/procured” language unless a source explicitly says delivered or fielded. [MOD FY2025 Budget; MOD FY2026 Budget] Sources
ATLA’s FY2018 guide identifies FY2010 as the Type 10 program’s deployment or procurement baseline. Other service chronologies use 2011–2012 for initial unit entry, reflecting different milestones. Sources
Design and performance
Type 10 uses a conventional modern MBT layout: driver in the front hull, turret fighting compartment in the center, and engine/transmission at the rear. It has a three-person crew, enabled by an automatic loader rather than a human loader. The official ATLA guide explicitly lists the engine, transmission, and automatic loader as major Type 10 components made by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, while the JGSDF specifications list a three-person crew. [ATLA FY2018 Guide; JGSDF Equipment] Sources
The hull is compact for a current MBT and is central to the Type 10's design logic. Official dimensions vary slightly between public sources, with the JGSDF page giving about 9.5 m length and the ATLA English guide giving about 9.4 m; both give about 3.2 m width, about 2.3 m height, and about 44 t weight. This minor length difference is a normal public-specification discrepancy, not a substantive conflict. [JGSDF Equipment; ATLA FY2018 Guide] Sources
The hull design is commonly associated with modular armor and weight modularity, but public official sources do not disclose armor composition, thickness, or equivalent resistance. The cited sources describe modular armor as a key feature, and the visual design shows angular side and turret modules. The broader claim is not established by the cited evidence. [MHI Type 10] Sources
The turret is a compact, angular design carrying the 120 mm smoothbore gun, coaxial/vehicle machine gun arrangements, optics, smoke dischargers, and a roof-mounted 12.7 mm machine gun. Public photographs show a bustle-like rear structure and modular-looking turret cheeks/sides, but precise internal ammunition arrangement and blow-off/survivability design are not confirmed by official open sources reviewed here. The three-person crew and official automatic-loader component listing confirm that the turret does not require a human loader. [ATLA FY2018 Guide; JGSDF Equipment] Sources
Armor is the least transparent part of the Type 10 public record. The MHI page states that the tank provides protection capabilities, and Published accounts describe modular armor, but neither source gives armor thickness or protection equivalents. The Type 10 is therefore best described as a modular, classified, composite/steel modern armor scheme whose exact resistance remain unspecified in the cited record. [MHI Type 10] Sources
The main armament is a 120 mm smoothbore gun. The JGSDF official page lists “120mm滑腔砲” (120 mm smoothbore gun), and the ATLA English guide lists a 120 mm smooth-bore cannon with Japan Steel Works as the cannon assembly manufacturer. During the 2026 JGSDF accident press conference, the Chief of Staff also confirmed that the training involved a Type 10 120 mm smoothbore main gun and live fire. [JGSDF Equipment; ATLA FY2018 Guide; JGSDF Accident 2026-04-21] Sources
The JGSDF page lists a 12.7 mm heavy machine gun and a Type 74 vehicle-mounted 7.62 mm machine gun as the Type 10's secondary weapons. The exact mount arrangement may vary by training or vehicle configuration, but the basic secondary armament is well supported by official data. [JGSDF Equipment] Sources
The public record confirms the caliber and live-fire use but not a complete ammunition inventory or stowage count. The 2026 accident press conference identified the type of shell involved as an anti-tank high-explosive round used by Type 10, Type 90, and Type 16 systems; the same press conference confirmed live firing from the Type 10's 120 mm smoothbore gun. Public claims about Type 10 APFSDS performance, ready-rack count, or total ammunition stowage is described as secondary unless tied to official test or procurement documents. [JGSDF Accident 2026-04-21] Sources
Official public language stresses accurate shooting at high speeds and C4I integration rather than disclosing the full fire-control architecture. MHI states that the tank is equipped with a real-time data link system and provides accurate shooting at high speeds; the JGSDF page emphasizes C4I information sharing between tanks and with infantry networks. It is reasonable to infer a stabilized gun, modern thermal/day-night sights, and digital ballistic computation. The broader claim is not established by the cited evidence. [MHI Type 10; JGSDF Equipment] Sources
Public images show roofline sighting and sensor housings consistent with a modern hunter-killer-capable MBT, but precise model names and capabilities are not confirmed in the official open sources reviewed here. Sources
The JGSDF official page lists a water-cooled, four-cycle, eight-cylinder diesel engine and prints “12,00ps/2,300rpm,” evidently meaning about 1,200 ps at 2,300 rpm. The ATLA English guide provides the clearer figure: a 4-stroke 8-cylinder water-cooled engine with maximum output of 1,200 hp. ATLA also identifies the transmission as a step-less continuously variable transmission. [JGSDF Equipment; ATLA FY2018 Guide] Sources
The cited sources describe hydropneumatic suspension as a Type 10 feature and includes hydropneumatic suspension in the project key terms. That is consistent with the Type 10's publicly known posture-control reputation and with the vehicle's need for high mobility and gun handling on Japanese terrain. However, the official JGSDF and ATLA sources in the cited record do not give a full suspension technical description, so fine details is described as less certain unless backed by a manual. [MHI Type 10] Sources
Official sources give the tank a maximum speed of about 70 km/h and a 44-ton class combat weight. Using the ATLA 1,200 hp figure and the official 44 t weight yields a public power-to-weight ratio of roughly 27.3 hp/t. MHI adds a qualitative claim that the vehicle has mobility such as left-right slalom and accurate shooting at high speeds. Publicly available data therefore supports a high-mobility design, while endurance, fuel consumption, obstacle-crossing figures, and track life remain incompletely documented. [JGSDF Equipment; ATLA FY2018 Guide; MHI Type 10] Sources
The crew is three: commander, gunner, and driver. The absence of a loader reduces crew size but increases reliance on the autoloader and maintenance system. The benefits are a smaller turret and lower personnel burden; the tradeoffs are reduced fourth-crew flexibility for maintenance, security, and ammunition handling during sustained operations. This is an interpretation based on the confirmed three-crew/autoloader configuration and broader MBT crew-composition logic. [ATLA FY2018 Guide; JGSDF Equipment] Sources
C4I is the Type 10's defining public feature. The JGSDF official page states that the vehicle is integrated into the GSDF network, can share information among tanks, and can link with infantry field computer networks to enable integrated operations with infantry units. The ATLA equipment guide also identifies C4I as a major characteristic enabling information sharing between tanks. [JGSDF Equipment; ATLA FY2018 Guide] Sources
Public sources confirm smoke launchers visually and general protection capability textually, but no official open source reviewed here confirms an active protection system, hard-kill countermeasure, or exact electronic defensive suite. The 2024-2026 public debate around modern anti-tank weapons and drones makes this a key an unresolved question for future updates. [MHI Type 10; JGSDF Equipment] Sources
No open official mean-time-between-failure or operational availability data was found. The Type 11 CVR derivative, however, shows that the Type 10 hull family has a dedicated tracked recovery/support vehicle, and ATLA's supply-chain material suggests a large domestic industrial base for sustainment. The three-crew/autoloader arrangement may reduce personnel needs but increases the importance of loader reliability and trained maintenance. [JGSDF Equipment; ATLA Supply Chain] Sources
Known or likely weaknesses from open sources are mostly structural and contextual: restricted public armor data, no combat record, small annual production runs, no confirmed export base, dependence on Japanese domestic supply chains, and limited publicly verifiable data on ammunition stowage and autoloader survivability. The 2026 Hijudai accident cannot yet be turned into a design indictment; official JGSDF statements were still treating the cause as under investigation, including potential factors related to the gun, turret, ammunition, situation, or human factors. [JGSDF Accident 2026-05-19; Joint Staff Accident Message] Sources
Production, operators, and combat record
The Type 10 is a domestic Japanese armored-vehicle program. The official JGSDF equipment page names Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Japan Steel Works as the manufacturers. The ATLA guide breaks that down further: MHI for the body, engine, transmission, and automatic loader, and Japan Steel Works for the cannon assembly. The cited accounts published figures independently points to the MHI Type 10 page and MHI Defense Vehicles page as well-documented manufacturer sources. [JGSDF Equipment; ATLA FY2018 Guide] Sources
The industrial story is bigger than two prime names. ATLA's 2025/2026-era supply-chain explanatory material gives the Type 10 tank as a defense-equipment example involving about 1,300 companies, based on a 2016 ATLA survey. That figure helps explain why a low-volume domestic tank can still be strategically important: it sustains metallurgical, cannon, armor, diesel, transmission, autoloader, electronic, optical, integration, and maintenance capacity inside Japan. [ATLA Supply Chain] Sources
Public production data is best understood as a sequence of budgeted procurement lines, not as a guaranteed delivered-fleet count. The cited accounts say “ongoing annual procurement,” and official recent budget documents list 12 Type 10 tanks in FY2025 and 8 Type 10 MBTs in FY2026. Sources
The exact cumulative number depends on whether FY2023 is counted and whether budgeted units are equated to delivered tanks. A conservative budgeted/procurement aggregation through FY2026 is therefore best stated as “roughly 140 to mid-150s budgeted/procured units, depending on FY2023 treatment,” rather than as a single definitive fleet count. Sources
No export production or licensed production was confirmed. Type 10 lacks the export-driven upgrade ecosystem seen in Leopard 2, Abrams, K2, or T-90. Its modernization pathway depends primarily on Japanese budgets, JGSDF doctrine, and domestic industrial policy. [MHI Type 10; MOD FY2025 Budget; MOD FY2026 Budget] Sources
The only confirmed operator in the available accounts and official sources reviewed is Japan, specifically the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force. The cited accounts operator record O-JP-TYPE10 lists Japan as the operator and marks the vehicle as active from 2011-present, with the role “domestic production” and quantity scale “JGSDF modern tank fleet.”. Sources
The Type 10 entered service during a transitional period in which the JGSDF was reducing and restructuring armored forces while replacing older Type 74s and retaining Type 90s in appropriate formations. The JGSDF official page does not list each unit, but it frames the tank as part of anti-armor combat, mobile strike, and networked infantry-tank operations. [JGSDF Equipment; MOD FY2011 Budget] Sources
The cited accounts do not establish captured employment, a foreign operator, or combat export use of Type 10. Reports of foreign interest do not by themselves establish an acquisition. Sources
The Type 10 has no confirmed combat history. Its operational record in open sources consists of fielding, training, exercises, demonstrations, and domestic defense readiness. The vehicle cannot be credited with combat performance claims that it has not had the opportunity to demonstrate. [JGSDF Equipment] Sources
The most serious public service event is the 21 April 2026 accident during tank live-fire training at the Hijudai training area. The Joint Staff Chief's 24 April message stated that a shell ruptured during tank firing training and that three of four Type 10 crew members died while one was injured. The JGSDF Chief of Staff's extraordinary press conference stated that the training involved Type 10 tanks of the Western Army tank unit and that the firing was live fire from a 120 mm smoothbore gun. [Joint Staff Accident Message; JGSDF Accident 2026-04-21] Sources
As of the 19 May 2026 JGSDF press conference, the Chief of Staff said Type 10 tank-gun firing training would not resume until the accident investigation could clarify possible factors involving the tank gun, turret, ammunition, situation, or human factors. Because the official investigation was still unresolved in public statements reviewed here, Published accounts describe the accident as a service-history and safety event, not as evidence proving a specific design defect. [JGSDF Accident 2026-05-19] Sources
Official statements report the deaths of serving personnel in the accident. They do not establish a complete technical explanation of its cause. [Joint Staff Accident Message; JGSDF Accident 2026-05-19] Sources
Forecast International estimates five Type 10 prototypes and 113 serial-production tanks through 2023. This is a dated secondary estimate rather than a complete official acceptance record. Sources
Legacy and historical evidence
The Type 10's comparative value is not captured by a single metric. It gives up the visible mass of heavy Western MBTs but gains deployability, network integration, and domestic infrastructure compatibility. Its uncertain variables are armor protection, ammunition survivability, and sustained readiness data. Therefore the fairest assessment is “highly optimized for Japan; unproven in combat; difficult to rank globally from open sources.”. [JGSDF Equipment; MHI Type 10; ATLA FY2018 Guide] Sources
The Type 10's main legacy is doctrinal and industrial. Doctrinally, it embodies Japan's move toward a more networked, mobile, smaller tank force able to operate with infantry and digital command systems. Industrially, it preserves a domestic MBT design, gun, autoloader, engine/transmission, and integration base at a time when many allied countries have abandoned independent tank development. [JGSDF Equipment; ATLA FY2018 Guide; ATLA Supply Chain] Sources
Its influence outside Japan has been limited by policy and export realities. The tank has not created a family of export derivatives or foreign co-production programs. Nevertheless, the Type 10 is a useful reference point for future armored warfare because it shows one answer to a problem many countries now face: how to retain heavy direct fire when infrastructure, manpower, budget, drones, long-range fires, and distributed defense all pressure traditional tank fleets. [MHI Type 10; MOD FY2025 Budget; MOD FY2026 Budget] Sources
Surviving vehicles and public displays are visible in Japan, including production vehicles photographed at Camp Takeyama and Northern Army events and at least one prototype display photographed at the JGSDF Public Information Center at Camp Asaka. Sources
Type 10's lower weight than Abrams or Leopard 2 does not make it a light tank or establish inferior protection by itself. Budget authorizations also differ from delivered fleet totals. Precise armor and ammunition claims remain uncertain where unsupported by identified sources. Sources
The source base is strongest for official specifications, manufacturer identity, C4I description, current budget lines, operator identity, and the 2026 accident statements. It is weakest for armor protection, ammunition stowage, fire-control details, exact delivered fleet numbers, and final accident causation. Sources
Type 10 is a Japanese JGSDF main battle tank family indexed as F-JP-TYPE10 in the available accounts. Sources
The official JGSDF specification is a three-person crew, about 44 t weight, about 9.4-9.5 m length, about 3.2 m width, about 2.3 m height, about 70 km/h maximum speed, and 120 mm smoothbore armament. Sources
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Japan Steel Works are the major named manufacturers; ATLA identifies MHI for body, engine, transmission, and automatic loader, and Japan Steel Works for the cannon assembly. Sources
C4I / information sharing is an official public feature of the Type 10. Sources
Japan remains the only confirmed operator in the available accounts and reviewed official sources. Sources
The 2026 Hijudai accident occurred during Type 10 live-fire training and involved three fatalities and one injury among four crew; official cause remained under investigation in the public statements reviewed. Sources
Hydropneumatic/posture-control suspension is a Type 10 feature; the cited accounts and public technical consensus support it, but the reviewed official pages do not provide a detailed suspension specification. Sources
Cumulative budgeted/procured unit counts are roughly in the 140s-150s through FY2026 depending on FY2023 treatment; this cannot be printed as delivered fleet strength without confirming each original budget and delivery record. Sources
The development timeline commonly cited as early 2000s through 2009 is consistent with the cited accounts and secondary sources. The broader claim is not established by the cited evidence. Sources
Exact armor thickness, RHAe values, or armor-module composition. Sources
Exact ammunition capacity, autoloader ready-rack count, and crew-compartment ammunition arrangement. Sources
Claims of export adoption or foreign purchase interest without current official confirmation. Sources
Claims assigning final cause for the 2026 accident before official findings are released. Sources
Video-game, forum, or unsourced database performance values. Sources
Photographs and image credits
Background reading and references. Each photograph has its own source and credit.
_-_Japan_Ground_Self-Defense_Force._(53825532426).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Sources and further reading
Background reading and references. Each photograph has its own source and credit.
- MHI Type 10: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Type 10 Main Battle Tank official page. URL/source:. Note: Manufacturer description of Type 10 as latest model with real-time data link, high-speed shooting, mobility, firepower, and protection
- MHI Defense Vehicles: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Defense Vehicles page. URL/source:. Note: Manufacturer context for MHI defense vehicle portfolio
- JGSDF Equipment: Japan Ground Self-Defense Force equipment page - vehicles. URL/source:. Note: Official Japanese-language specifications for Type 10 and Type 11 CVR; official description of Type 10 C4I networking
- ATLA FY2018 Guide: Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency, Introduction to the Equipment of the Japan Self-Defense Force, FY2018. URL/source:. Note: English-language official equipment guide with Type 10 description, specifications, manufacturers, and C4I note
- MOD FY2011 Budget: Japan Ministry of Defense, Defense Programs and Budget of Japan - Overview of FY2011 Budget. URL/source:. Note: Official English budget overview describing continuing procurement of Type 10 tanks as smaller, lighter, mobile, and networked
- MOD FY2025 Budget: Japan Ministry of Defense, Defense Programs and Budget of Japan - Overview of FY2025 Budget. URL/source:. Note: Official English budget overview listing acquisition of 12 Type 10 tanks for 22.9 billion yen
- MOD FY2026 Budget: Japan Ministry of Defense, Defense Programs and Budget of Japan - Overview of FY2026 Budget. URL/source:. Note: Official English budget overview listing acquisition of 8 Type 10 MBTs for 15.8 billion yen
- MOD 2026 Japanese Budget: Japan Ministry of Defense, FY2026 Japanese budget overview. URL/source:. Note: Japanese-language budget overview confirming 8 Type 10 tanks and 15.8 billion yen
- ATLA Supply Chain: ATLA, Defense Production Base Strengthening Act explanatory material, November Reiwa 7 edition. URL/source:. Note: Official example listing Type 10 tank supply chain scale at about 1,300 companies based on a 2016 ATLA survey
- JGSDF Accident 2026-04-21: JGSDF Chief of Staff extraordinary press conference, 21 April 2026. URL/source:. Note: Official statements on the Hijudai live-fire accident involving Type 10 tanks and 120 mm smoothbore live fire
- JGSDF Accident 2026-05-19: JGSDF Chief of Staff regular press conference, 19 May 2026. URL/source:. Note: Official statement that Type 10 tank-gun firing training would not resume until the accident investigation clarified causes
- Joint Staff Accident Message: Joint Staff Chief message and press conference, 24 April 2026. URL/source:. Note: Official message confirming the April 21 shell rupture accident, three deaths, and one injury among four Type 10 crew
- Forecast International: Forecast International, Type 10 archived report, March 2024. URL/source:. Note: Secondary market/defense-industrial report.